Dagmar Wujastyk explores the moral discourses on the practice of medicine in the foundational texts of Ayurveda. The classical ayurvedic treatises were composed in Sanskrit between the first and the fifth centuries CE, and the later works, dating into the sixteenth century CE, were still considered strongly authoritative. As Wujastyk shows, these works testify to an elaborate system of medical ethics and etiquette. Physicians looked to the ayurvedic treatises for a guide to professional conduct. Ayurvedic discourses on good medical practice depict the physician as highly-educated, skilled, moral, and well-mannered. The rules of conduct positioned physicians within mainstream societys and characterized medical practice as a trustworthy and socially acceptable profession. At the same time, professional success was largely based on a particular physicians ability to cure his patients. This resulted intension, as some treatments and medications were considered socially or religiously unacceptable. Doctors needed to treat their patients successfully while ostensibly following the rules of acceptable behavior. Wujastyk offers insight into the many unorthodox methods of avoiding conflict while ensuring patient compliance shown in the ayurvedic treatises, giving a disarmingly candid perspective on the realities of medical practice and its crucial role in a profoundly well-mannered society.
Abbreviations; Acknowledgements; Introduction; 1 The pillars of treatment; 2 On becoming a physician; 3 On continued learning and interaction with peers; 4 To care or not to care; 5 The rewards of medical practice; 6 Veracity in the doctor-patient relationship; 7 Ethical elisions; 8 Concluding reflections; Appendices; A Sanskrit text passages: The pillars of treatment; B Sanskrit text passages: On becoming a physician; C Sanskrit text passages: On continued learning and interaction with peers; D Sanskrit text passages: To care or not to care; E Sanskrit text passages: The rewards of medical practice; F Sanskrit text passages: Veracity in the doctor-patient relationship; Notes; Bibliography;
Comments (0)
Your review appreciation cannot be sent
Report comment
Are you sure that you want to report this comment?
Report sent
Your report has been submitted and will be considered by a moderator.