This book disentangles complex discourses around humanitarianism to understand the nature of British colonialism in India. It contends that the colonial project of animal protection in late nineteenth-century Bengal mirrored an irony. Emerging notions of public health and debates on cruelty against animals exposed the disjunction between the claims of a benevolent Empire and a powerful imperial reality where the state constantly sought to discipline its subjects-both human andnonhuman. Centered around stories of animals as diseased, eaten, and overworked, thebook shows how such contests over appropriate measures for controlling animals became part of wider discussions surrounding environmental ethics, diet, sanitation, and the politics of race and class. The authorcombines history with archive, arguing that colonial humanitarianism was not only an idiom of rule, but was also translated into Bengali dietetics, anxieties, vegetarianism, and vigilantism, the effect of which can be seen incontemporary politics of animal slaughter in India.
Acknowledgements; List of Legislations; List of Tables and Figures; Introduction:: Writing Embodied Histories-Humans and Non-humans in Nature, Science, and Imperialism; 1. Historicizing Humanitarianism in Colonial India; 2. The Politics of Care:: Veterinarians and Humanitarians; 3. Meat:: To Eat or Not to Eat?; 4. The Anomaly of Animal:: Unburdening the Beast; Conclusion:: Liminal Boundaries, Colonial Ironies; Glossary; Bibliography; Index; About the Author;
Comments (0)
Your review appreciation cannot be sent
Report comment
Are you sure that you want to report this comment?
Report sent
Your report has been submitted and will be considered by a moderator.