This book is an account of criticism and controversy surrounding modern medicine. Chapter One provides an overview of the contents. Chapter Four explains the contribution of the concept of paradigm to the analysis provided. The argument is that, for all its fine accomplishments in medicine, the science has also damaged the art. This view is an echo of views expressed by eminent physicians early in the last Century, including William Osler and Francis Peabody. Concrete evidence of an ailing doctor-patient relationship is manifest in the form of some serious clinical problems. These include patient dissatisfaction, failure to take prescribed medication, failure of a doctors reassurance of normality to allay anxiety, resort to alternative medicine, use of patient advocates and defection to alternative medicine. These we see as, not only damaging to treatment and health outcome, and very expensive, but indicators of a basic lack of trust.
Preface; Introduction; The Smoke:: Complaint, Criticism, Controversy, Conflict; The Public Perspective:: More Smoke; The Fire:: Paradigm, Thought Collective or Discourse; The Classical Paradigm of Medicine; The Shift of Paradigm to Modern Medicine; Paradigms Close to Medicine:: Public Health, the Social Sciences & Medical Ethics; Paradigmatic Conflict in the Peripheral Zone:: The Case of Alternative Medicine; Clinical Inefficiency; Consultation Failure:: Its Genesis; Consultation Failure:: the Symptoms; The Evaluation of Health Care; Evidence-Based Medicine:: the Clash with Clinical Medicine; Postmodern Medicine; The Reflective Physician, Clinical Practice Research & Centre for the Study of Clinical Practice; Index.
Komentarze (0)
Chwilowo nie możesz polubić tej opinii
Zgłoś komentarz
Czy jesteś pewien, że chcesz zgłosić ten komentarz?
Zgłoszenie wysłane
Twój komentarz został wysłany i będzie widoczny po zatwierdzeniu przez moderatora.